> >Is it because the static void is on the previous line?
> Yes, it is because the static void is on the previous line.
>
> I can add one patch to fix the previous line , and this patch will correct
> automatically.
>
> do it need V2 patchset? or push a new patch after this patchset?
Thanks fo
On 2018/1/5 22:54, Andrew Lunn wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c
@@ -1126,6 +1126,7 @@ static int hns3_nic_set_features(struct net_device
*netdev,
{
struct hns3_nic_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c
> @@ -1126,6 +1126,7 @@ static int hns3_nic_set_features(struct net_device
> *netdev,
> {
> struct hns3_nic_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
> int queue_num = priv->ae_hand
From: Jian Shen
It takes more than 200 query response messages between
driver and IMP, while updating the packet statistics.
It's too heavy for IMP to update it per second.
Extend the update period of packet statistics data from
1 second to 300 seconds(if too long, the statistics may
overflow).
