Re: [PATCH net-next 00/17] net: snmp: update SNMP methods

2016-04-28 Thread Nicolas Dichtel
Le 28/04/2016 14:00, Eric Dumazet a écrit : [snip] > Hi Nicolas, thanks for testing. > > Oh right, I shouldn't have changed the BH disabling of 64bit stats on > 32bit arches, of course. > > Can you double check this will fix the problem ? Thanks ! Thank you for the quick fix! Tested-by: Nicolas

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/17] net: snmp: update SNMP methods

2016-04-28 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 12:05 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > Le 28/04/2016 01:44, Eric Dumazet a écrit : > > In the old days (before linux-3.0), SNMP counters were duplicated, > > one set for user context, and anther one for BH context. > > > > After commit 8f0ea0fe3a03 ("snmp: reduce percpu needs

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/17] net: snmp: update SNMP methods

2016-04-27 Thread David Miller
From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:44:26 -0700 > In the old days (before linux-3.0), SNMP counters were duplicated, > one set for user context, and anther one for BH context. > > After commit 8f0ea0fe3a03 ("snmp: reduce percpu needs by 50%") > we have a single copy, and what really mat

[PATCH net-next 00/17] net: snmp: update SNMP methods

2016-04-27 Thread Eric Dumazet
In the old days (before linux-3.0), SNMP counters were duplicated, one set for user context, and anther one for BH context. After commit 8f0ea0fe3a03 ("snmp: reduce percpu needs by 50%") we have a single copy, and what really matters is preemption being enabled or disabled, since we use this_cpu_i