Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking

2016-10-14 Thread David Miller
From: David Ahern Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:51:48 -0700 > The netdev adjacency tracking is failing to create proper dependencies > for some topologies. For example this topology > > ++ > | myvrf | > ++ > || > | +-+ >

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking

2016-10-13 Thread David Ahern
On 10/13/16 1:34 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > > Although I didn't like the "all-list" idea when Veaceslav pushed it > because it looked to me like a big hammer, it turned out to be very handy > and quick for traversing neighbours. Why it cannot be fixed? > > The walks with possibly hundreds of functio

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking

2016-10-13 Thread Jiri Pirko
Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:51:48PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote: >The netdev adjacency tracking is failing to create proper dependencies >for some topologies. For example this topology > >++ >| myvrf | >++ > || > | +-+ >

[PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking

2016-10-12 Thread David Ahern
The netdev adjacency tracking is failing to create proper dependencies for some topologies. For example this topology ++ | myvrf | ++ || | +-+ | | macvlan | | +-+ || +---