Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:50:10PM CEST, pab...@redhat.com wrote:
>On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 17:17 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Jiri Benc wrote:
>> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:41:37 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> > > Please note that the way the rule is being set to the HW drive
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:29:03PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Simon Horman
> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:23:34 +0200
>
> > From: Simon Horman
> >
> > John says:
> >
> > This patch set allows offloading of TC flower match and set tunnel fields
> > to the NFP. The initial focus is on VXLAN
From: Simon Horman
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:23:34 +0200
> From: Simon Horman
>
> John says:
>
> This patch set allows offloading of TC flower match and set tunnel fields
> to the NFP. The initial focus is on VXLAN traffic. Due to the current
> state of the NFP firmware, only VXLAN traffic on
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 17:17 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Jiri Benc wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:41:37 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > > Please note that the way the rule is being set to the HW driver is by
> > > delegation
> > > done in flower, see these commits (
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:17:02 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> maybe before/instead you call it a bug,
But it is a bug. When offloaded, the rules must not behave differently.
That's the fundamental thing about offloading. Here, the rules behave
differently when offloaded and when not. That's a bug.
> ta
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:41:37 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> Please note that the way the rule is being set to the HW driver is by
>> delegation
>> done in flower, see these commits (specifically "Add offload support
>> using egress Hardware device"
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:41:37 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Please note that the way the rule is being set to the HW driver is by
> delegation
> done in flower, see these commits (specifically "Add offload support
> using egress Hardware device")
It's very well possible the bug is somewhere in net/sc
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 19:04:53 +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
>> The MAC addresses are extracted from the netdevs already loaded in the
>> kernel and are monitored for any changes. The IP addresses are slightly
>> different in that they are extracted f
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 19:04:53 +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> The MAC addresses are extracted from the netdevs already loaded in the
> kernel and are monitored for any changes. The IP addresses are slightly
> different in that they are extracted from the rules themselves. We make the
> assumption that,
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 06:25:03PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Simon Horman
> wrote:
> > From: Simon Horman
> >
> > John says:
> >
> > This patch set allows offloading of TC flower match and set tunnel fields
> > to the NFP. The initial focus is on VXLAN traffic. D
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Simon Horman
wrote:
> From: Simon Horman
>
> John says:
>
> This patch set allows offloading of TC flower match and set tunnel fields
> to the NFP. The initial focus is on VXLAN traffic. Due to the current
> state of the NFP firmware, only VXLAN traffic on well kn
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:23:34 +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> From: Simon Horman
>
> John says:
>
> This patch set allows offloading of TC flower match and set tunnel fields
> to the NFP. The initial focus is on VXLAN traffic. Due to the current
> state of the NFP firmware, only VXLAN traffic on wel
From: Simon Horman
John says:
This patch set allows offloading of TC flower match and set tunnel fields
to the NFP. The initial focus is on VXLAN traffic. Due to the current
state of the NFP firmware, only VXLAN traffic on well known port 4789 is
handled. The match and action fields must explici
13 matches
Mail list logo
