On 5/22/18 2:44 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 5/22/18 12:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I'll apply this series.
>>
>> But if this breaks things for anyone in a practical way, I am unfortunately
>> going to have to revert no matter how silly the current behavior may be.
>>
>
> Understood. I hav
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace use
cases
On 5/22/18 12:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> Ok, I'll apply this series.
>
> But if this breaks things for anyone in a practical way, I am unfortunately
> going to have to revert no matter h
On 5/22/18 12:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> Ok, I'll apply this series.
>
> But if this breaks things for anyone in a practical way, I am unfortunately
> going to have to revert no matter how silly the current behavior may be.
>
Understood. I have to try the best option first. I'll look at
reg
From: dsah...@kernel.org
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 10:26:51 -0700
> This patch set fixes a few append and replace uses cases for IPv6
> and adds test cases that codifies the expectations of how append and
> replace are expected to work. In paricular it allows a multipath
> route to have a dev-only ne
From: David Ahern
This patch set fixes a few append and replace uses cases for IPv6 and
adds test cases that codifies the expectations of how append and replace
are expected to work. In paricular it allows a multipath route to have
a dev-only nexthop, something Thomas tried to accomplish with com
