> Vivien, Andrew, are you aware of an use case where we have the HW
> programmed with a superset of VLANs wrt. the SW bridge?
I cannot think of any case with a superset. Subset yes, but not
superset.
Andrew
On 01/10/2017 08:08 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:25:06PM CET, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:08:46PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:14:36PM CET, ido...@idosch.org wrot
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:56:48 -0800
> On 01/09/2017 12:48 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:44:59AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This patch series is to resolve a sleeping function called in atomic context
>>> de
Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 05:08:52PM CET, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:25:06PM CET, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
>> >On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:08:46PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:14:36PM CET, ido.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:25:06PM CET, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:08:46PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:14:36PM CET, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
> >> >On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:56:48PM -080
Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:25:06PM CET, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:08:46PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:14:36PM CET, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:56:48PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> >> On 01/09/2017 12:48 PM, Ido Schimme
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:08:46PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:14:36PM CET, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:56:48PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> On 01/09/2017 12:48 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> >> > Hi Florian,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at
Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:14:36PM CET, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:56:48PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 01/09/2017 12:48 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> > Hi Florian,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:44:59AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> Thi
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:23:20PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Truth be told, I don't quite understand why switchdev infra even tries
> > to dump the VLANs from the device. Like, in which situations is this
> > going to be different from what the software bridge reports?
>
> What happens when th
> Truth be told, I don't quite understand why switchdev infra even tries
> to dump the VLANs from the device. Like, in which situations is this
> going to be different from what the software bridge reports?
What happens when the hardware is out of resources and says sorry,
cannot do that. There ha
Hi Florian, Ido,
Florian Fainelli writes:
>> Can't you just cache the PVID as well? I think this will solve your
>> problem. Didn't look too much into the b53 code, so maybe I'm missing
>> something. Seems that mv88e6xxx has a similar problem.
>
> I suppose we could indeed cache the PVID for b53
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:56:48PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 01/09/2017 12:48 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > Hi Florian,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:44:59AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This patch series is to resolve a sleeping function called in atomic
> >
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:48:49PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:44:59AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series is to resolve a sleeping function called in atomic context
> > debug splat that we observe with DSA.
> >
> > Let
On 01/09/2017 12:48 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:44:59AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patch series is to resolve a sleeping function called in atomic context
>> debug splat that we observe with DSA.
>>
>> Let me know what you think, I
Hi Florian,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:44:59AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series is to resolve a sleeping function called in atomic context
> debug splat that we observe with DSA.
>
> Let me know what you think, I was also wondering if we should just always
> make sw
Hi all,
This patch series is to resolve a sleeping function called in atomic context
debug splat that we observe with DSA.
Let me know what you think, I was also wondering if we should just always
make switchdev_port_vlan_fill() set SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER, but was afraid this
could cause invalid conte
16 matches
Mail list logo
