On 3/27/17 9:08 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I believe we should just kill MAX_NEW_LABELS.
>
> I think the only significant change from your patch is the removal of an
> array from mpls_route_config.
>
> With the removal of MAX_NEW_LABELS I would replace it by a sanity check
> in mpls_rt_alloc
On 3/27/17 9:08 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Overall I like what is being accomplished by this patchset.
> I especially like the fact that the forwarding path is left
> essentially unchanged, and that the struct mpls_route shirnks a little
> for the common case.
>
> I believe we should just k
On 25/03/17 17:03, David Ahern wrote:
Bump the maximum number of labels for MPLS routes from 2 to 12. To keep
memory consumption in check the labels array is moved to the end of mpls_nh
and mpls_iptunnel_encap structs as a 0-sized array. Allocations use the
maximum number of labels across all nex
On 28/03/17 04:08, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
David Ahern writes:
On 3/27/17 4:39 AM, Robert Shearman wrote:
On 25/03/17 19:15, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
David Ahern writes:
Bump the maximum number of labels for MPLS routes from 2 to 12. To keep
memory consumption in check the labels array i
David Ahern writes:
> On 3/27/17 4:39 AM, Robert Shearman wrote:
>> On 25/03/17 19:15, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> David Ahern writes:
>>>
Bump the maximum number of labels for MPLS routes from 2 to 12. To keep
memory consumption in check the labels array is moved to the end of
m
From: David Ahern
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:03:24 -0700
> Bump the maximum number of labels for MPLS routes from 2 to 12.
This doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, please respin.
Perhaps it conflicts with your recent cleanups.
On 3/27/17 4:39 AM, Robert Shearman wrote:
> On 25/03/17 19:15, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> David Ahern writes:
>>
>>> Bump the maximum number of labels for MPLS routes from 2 to 12. To keep
>>> memory consumption in check the labels array is moved to the end of
>>> mpls_nh
>>> and mpls_iptunnel_e
On 25/03/17 19:15, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
David Ahern writes:
Bump the maximum number of labels for MPLS routes from 2 to 12. To keep
memory consumption in check the labels array is moved to the end of mpls_nh
and mpls_iptunnel_encap structs as a 0-sized array. Allocations use the
maximum nu
David Ahern writes:
> Bump the maximum number of labels for MPLS routes from 2 to 12. To keep
> memory consumption in check the labels array is moved to the end of mpls_nh
> and mpls_iptunnel_encap structs as a 0-sized array. Allocations use the
> maximum number of labels across all nexthops in a
Bump the maximum number of labels for MPLS routes from 2 to 12. To keep
memory consumption in check the labels array is moved to the end of mpls_nh
and mpls_iptunnel_encap structs as a 0-sized array. Allocations use the
maximum number of labels across all nexthops in a route for LSR and the
number
10 matches
Mail list logo
