From: Heiner Kallweit
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 21:54:23 +0200
> There have been few not that successful attempts in the past to make
> phy_stop() a synchronous call instead of just changing the state.
> Patch 1 of this series addresses an issue which prevented this change.
> At least for me it work
There have been few not that successful attempts in the past to make
phy_stop() a synchronous call instead of just changing the state.
Patch 1 of this series addresses an issue which prevented this change.
At least for me it works fine now. Would appreciate if Geert could
re-test as well that suspe
