Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] mlx4 XDP TX refactor

2016-10-30 Thread David Miller
From: Tariq Toukan Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:21:26 +0200 > Hi Dave, > > This series makes Brenden's fix unneeded: > 958b3d396d7f ("net/mlx4_en: fixup xdp tx irq to match rx") > > The fix got into net, but yet to be in net-next. > > Should I wait with this series and send a re-spin, with a reve

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] mlx4 XDP TX refactor

2016-10-30 Thread Tariq Toukan
Hi Dave, This series makes Brenden's fix unneeded: 958b3d396d7f ("net/mlx4_en: fixup xdp tx irq to match rx") The fix got into net, but yet to be in net-next. Should I wait with this series and send a re-spin, with a revert of the fix, once it gets into net-next? Regards, Tariq On 27/10/20

[PATCH net-next 0/2] mlx4 XDP TX refactor

2016-10-27 Thread Tariq Toukan
Hi Dave, This patchset refactors the XDP forwarding case, so that its dedicated transmit queues are managed in a complete separation from the other regular ones. Series generated against net-next commit: 6edf10173a1f "devlink: Prevent port_type_set() callback when it's not needed" Thanks, Tariq.