On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:44:56AM -0800, Ivan Babrou wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 4:23 AM Martin Habets
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 04:18:53PM -0800, Ivan Babrou wrote:
> > > Queue sharing behaviour already exists in the out-of-tree sfc driver,
> > > available under xdp_alloc_tx
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 4:23 AM Martin Habets wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 04:18:53PM -0800, Ivan Babrou wrote:
> > Queue sharing behaviour already exists in the out-of-tree sfc driver,
> > available under xdp_alloc_tx_resources module parameter.
>
> This comment is not relevant for in-tree
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 04:18:53PM -0800, Ivan Babrou wrote:
> Queue sharing behaviour already exists in the out-of-tree sfc driver,
> available under xdp_alloc_tx_resources module parameter.
This comment is not relevant for in-tree patches. I'd also like to
make clear that we never intend to upst
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:18:53 -0800 Ivan Babrou wrote:
> Queue sharing behaviour already exists in the out-of-tree sfc driver,
> available under xdp_alloc_tx_resources module parameter.
>
> This avoids the following issue on machines with many cpus:
>
> Insufficient resources for 12 XDP event queu
Queue sharing behaviour already exists in the out-of-tree sfc driver,
available under xdp_alloc_tx_resources module parameter.
This avoids the following issue on machines with many cpus:
Insufficient resources for 12 XDP event queues (24 other channels, max 32)
Which in turn triggers EINVAL on X
