Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix recursive locking warning in sctp_do_peeloff

2017-06-10 Thread David Miller
From: Xin Long Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:56:56 +0800 > Dmitry got the following recursive locking report while running syzkaller > fuzzer, the Call Trace: ... > This warning is caused by the lock held by sctp_getsockopt() is on one > socket, while the other lock that sctp_close() is getting late

Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix recursive locking warning in sctp_do_peeloff

2017-06-10 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 02:56:56PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > Dmitry got the following recursive locking report while running syzkaller > fuzzer, the Call Trace: > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:16 [inline] > dump_stack+0x2ee/0x3ef lib/dump_stack.c:52 > print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1

[PATCH net-next] sctp: fix recursive locking warning in sctp_do_peeloff

2017-06-09 Thread Xin Long
Dmitry got the following recursive locking report while running syzkaller fuzzer, the Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:16 [inline] dump_stack+0x2ee/0x3ef lib/dump_stack.c:52 print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1729 [inline] check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1773 [inline]