Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix identification of new acks for SFR-CACC

2018-04-25 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 01:22:39PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:17:35 -0300 > > > It's currently written as: > > > > if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) { [1] > > tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1; > > ... > > } > > > > if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn

Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix identification of new acks for SFR-CACC

2018-04-25 Thread David Miller
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:17:35 -0300 > It's currently written as: > > if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) { [1] > tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1; > ... > } > > if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn)) { > if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) { > /* SFR-CACC proces

Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix identification of new acks for SFR-CACC

2018-04-25 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:17:35PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > It's currently written as: > > if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) { [1] > tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1; > ... > } > > if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn)) { > if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) { > /* SFR-CACC pro

Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix identification of new acks for SFR-CACC

2018-04-25 Thread Xin Long
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:17 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > It's currently written as: > > if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) { [1] > tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1; > ... > } > > if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn)) { > if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) { > /* SFR-CACC proce

[PATCH net-next] sctp: fix identification of new acks for SFR-CACC

2018-04-24 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
It's currently written as: if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) { [1] tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1; ... } if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn)) { if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) { /* SFR-CACC processing */ ... } } Which causes the SFR-CACC processing on a