Hi, David and Cong
I don't quite understand where this patch to go. This patch wants to
delete the LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITKILLED counter. Moving snmp.h out of the
uapi directory is a difference thing. Do we really need to do it?
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:58 PM Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 20
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:14 PM peng yu wrote:
>
> Hello, I think the snmp.h didn't try to keep user-space compatibility,
> so we could delete LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITKILLED counter. Do I
> misunderstand anything?
I don't know. Maybe user-space doesn't need these definitions at all,
as like nstat can
Hello, I think the snmp.h didn't try to keep user-space compatibility,
so we could delete LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITKILLED counter. Do I
misunderstand anything?
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:26 PM peng yu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:07 AM Cong Wang wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:43 AM
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:07 AM Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:43 AM yupeng wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
> > index 86dc24a96c90..fb0a17337bf2 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
> > @@ -17
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:43 AM yupeng wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
> index 86dc24a96c90..fb0a17337bf2 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
> @@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ enum
> LINUX_MIB_ARPFILTER,
The most possible way to trigger TWKilled is using tcp_tw_recycle, but
tcp_tw_recycle was removed. The TWKilled could still be triggered if
below conditions are satisfied:
1 the tw_timer expires in fin_wait_2 status
2 the timeout value of tw_timer is changed to less than 4 seconds
(via net.ipv4.t
