From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:55:10 -0700
> Add a check whether the 'struct device_node' pointer passed to
> of_mdiobus_register() is an available (aka enabled) node in the Device
> Tree.
>
> Rationale for doing this are cases where an Ethernet MAC provides a MDIO
> bus contro
> Fair enough, I will submit something after re-spining this patch to use
> -ENODEV, which I agree is a better return code. Did you want me to
> remove that blurb from the commit message?
Blurb looks good. More blurb is better than less...
Andrew
On 28/04/16 15:12, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:55:10PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Add a check whether the 'struct device_node' pointer passed to
>> of_mdiobus_register() is an available (aka enabled) node in the Device
>> Tree.
>>
>> Rationale for doing this are cases whe
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:55:10PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Add a check whether the 'struct device_node' pointer passed to
> of_mdiobus_register() is an available (aka enabled) node in the Device
> Tree.
>
> Rationale for doing this are cases where an Ethernet MAC provides a MDIO
> bus con
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:55:10PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Add a check whether the 'struct device_node' pointer passed to
> of_mdiobus_register() is an available (aka enabled) node in the Device
> Tree.
>
> Rationale for doing this are cases where an Ethernet MAC provides a MDIO
> bus con
Add a check whether the 'struct device_node' pointer passed to
of_mdiobus_register() is an available (aka enabled) node in the Device
Tree.
Rationale for doing this are cases where an Ethernet MAC provides a MDIO
bus controller and node, and an additional Ethernet MAC might be
connecting its PHY/s
