Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: replace genphy_10g_driver with genphy_c45_driver

2019-04-08 Thread David Miller
From: Heiner Kallweit Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 13:55:01 +0200 > Recently a number of generic functions for Clause 45 PHY's has been > added. So let's replace the old very limited genphy_10g_driver with a > genphy_c45_driver. This driver isn't limited to 10G, however it's worth > to be noted that Cla

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: replace genphy_10g_driver with genphy_c45_driver

2019-04-07 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 01:55:01PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > Recently a number of generic functions for Clause 45 PHY's has been > added. So let's replace the old very limited genphy_10g_driver with a > genphy_c45_driver. This driver isn't limited to 10G, however it's worth > to be noted that

[PATCH net-next] net: phy: replace genphy_10g_driver with genphy_c45_driver

2019-04-07 Thread Heiner Kallweit
Recently a number of generic functions for Clause 45 PHY's has been added. So let's replace the old very limited genphy_10g_driver with a genphy_c45_driver. This driver isn't limited to 10G, however it's worth to be noted that Clause 45 doesn't cover 1000Base-T. For using 1000Base-T with a Clause 4