From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:23:34 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> per_cpu_inc() is faster (at least on x86) than per_cpu_ptr(xxx)++;
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
Applied.
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:04 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> On 08/24/2016 10:23 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > per_cpu_inc() is faster (at least on x86) than per_cpu_ptr(xxx)++;
>
> Is it possible it is non-trivially slower on other architectures?
No, in the worst case, compil
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:00 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> Looks good to me. I guess we can also do the same for overlimit qstats.
>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend
Not sure about overlimit, although I could probably change these :
net/sched/act_bpf.c:85:
qstats_drop_inc(this_cpu_ptr(prog-
On 08/24/2016 10:23 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet
per_cpu_inc() is faster (at least on x86) than per_cpu_ptr(xxx)++;
Is it possible it is non-trivially slower on other architectures?
rick jones
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
---
include/net/sch_generic.h |2 +-
1 file chan
On 16-08-24 10:23 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> per_cpu_inc() is faster (at least on x86) than per_cpu_ptr(xxx)++;
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
> ---
> include/net/sch_generic.h |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sch_g
From: Eric Dumazet
per_cpu_inc() is faster (at least on x86) than per_cpu_ptr(xxx)++;
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
---
include/net/sch_generic.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
index
0d501779cc68f9426e
