On Oct. Friday 30 (44) 09:52 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 04:36:56PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > All the mv88e6xxx drivers use the exact same code in their probe
> > function to lookup the switch name given its ID.
>
> I did consider this before. But they are not exactly t
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 04:36:56PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> All the mv88e6xxx drivers use the exact same code in their probe
> function to lookup the switch name given its ID.
I did consider this before. But they are not exactly the same, when
you consider the masking of the lower nibble whi
All the mv88e6xxx drivers use the exact same code in their probe
function to lookup the switch name given its ID. Thus introduce a
mv88e6xxx_switch_id structure and a mv88e6xxx_lookup_name function in
the common mv88e6xxx code.
In the meantime make __mv88e6xxx_reg_{read,write} static since they we
