At Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:48:48 -0600,
David Ahern wrote:
> > the conditions are
> >
> > - sendmsg () with INET6/RAW socket (with IPPROTO_MH)
> > - ip6_pktinfo.ipi6_addr (fl6.saddr) and ipi6_oif
> >(fl6.flowi6_oif) are non-NULL.
> > => ipi6_addr (fl6.saddr) is not the IP address of oif, but
> >
On 10/20/15 6:31 AM, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
yes, this sendmsg uses non-zero flowi6_oif.
the conditions are
- sendmsg () with INET6/RAW socket (with IPPROTO_MH)
- ip6_pktinfo.ipi6_addr (fl6.saddr) and ipi6_oif
(fl6.flowi6_oif) are non-NULL.
=> ipi6_addr (fl6.saddr) is not the IP address of oif
Hello David,
sorry for the delay.
At Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:01:30 -0600,
David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 10/11/15 8:24 AM, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
> >
> > I've faced this issue since the following patch was applied.
> >
> > commit 741a11d9e4103a8e1c590ef1280143fe654e4e33
> > Author: David Ahern
> > Date:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:49:29PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/9/15 11:27 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> >On 10/9/15 1:17 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.
Hi David.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:49:29PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/9/15 11:27 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> >
> >The attached patch applied to Linus' tree works for me. Currently the
> >above change is not in his tree, so I added it to this patch. Once you
> >confirm that it works for you I
On 10/9/15 11:27 AM, David Ahern wrote:
On 10/9/15 1:17 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *xfrm6_
On 10/11/15 8:24 AM, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
I've faced this issue since the following patch was applied.
commit 741a11d9e4103a8e1c590ef1280143fe654e4e33
Author: David Ahern
Date: Mon Sep 28 10:12:13 2015 -0700
net: ipv6: Add RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag if oif is set
I still couldn't spot wh
At Sun, 11 Oct 2015 07:31:32 -0600,
David Ahern wrote:
> >> The attached patch applied to Linus' tree works for me. Currently the
> >> above change is not in his tree, so I added it to this patch. Once you
> >> confirm that it works for you I'll create the delta-patch for net and
> >> send out.
>
On 10/11/15 7:22 AM, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
At Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:27:36 -0600,
David Ahern wrote:
[1 ]
On 10/9/15 1:17 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
+++ b/net/ipv6
At Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:27:36 -0600,
David Ahern wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On 10/9/15 1:17 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> >>> index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644
> >>> --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> >>> +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
On 10/9/15 1:17 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *xfrm6_dst_lookup(struct net *net,
int tos, int
On 10/9/15 1:17 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:54:22PM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
Hello David,
At Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:32:51 -0600,
David Ahern wrote:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644
--- a/net/ipv
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:54:22PM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> At Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:32:51 -0600,
> David Ahern wrote:
>
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> > index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> >
Hello David,
At Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:32:51 -0600,
David Ahern wrote:
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *xfrm6_dst
On 10/7/15 5:25 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Ahern
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:32:51 -0600
It occurred to me yesterday that 741a11d9e4103 ("net: ipv6: Add
RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag if oif is set") means that xfrm6_dst_lookup
needs the FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF flag set. This latest commit caus
From: David Ahern
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:32:51 -0600
> It occurred to me yesterday that 741a11d9e4103 ("net: ipv6: Add
> RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag if oif is set") means that xfrm6_dst_lookup
> needs the FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF flag set. This latest commit causes
> the oif to be considered in look
It occurred to me yesterday that 741a11d9e4103 ("net: ipv6: Add
RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag if oif is set") means that xfrm6_dst_lookup
needs the FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF flag set. This latest commit causes
the oif to be considered in lookups which is known to break vti. This
explains why 58189ca7b274 di
17 matches
Mail list logo
