On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 23:31:44 -0300 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 06:00:32PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:40:49 -0300 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > By setting NF_FLOWTABLE_COUNTER. Otherwise, the updates added by
> > > commit ef803b3cf96
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 06:00:32PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:40:49 -0300 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > By setting NF_FLOWTABLE_COUNTER. Otherwise, the updates added by
> > commit ef803b3cf96a ("netfilter: flowtable: add counter support in HW
> > offload") are not ef
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:40:49 -0300 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> By setting NF_FLOWTABLE_COUNTER. Otherwise, the updates added by
> commit ef803b3cf96a ("netfilter: flowtable: add counter support in HW
> offload") are not effective when using act_ct.
>
> While at it, now that we have the flag s
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:40:49PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> By setting NF_FLOWTABLE_COUNTER. Otherwise, the updates added by
> commit ef803b3cf96a ("netfilter: flowtable: add counter support in HW
> offload") are not effective when using act_ct.
>
> While at it, now that we have the
On 11/27/2020 2:40 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> By setting NF_FLOWTABLE_COUNTER. Otherwise, the updates added by
> commit ef803b3cf96a ("netfilter: flowtable: add counter support in HW
> offload") are not effective when using act_ct.
>
> While at it, now that we have the flag set, protect
By setting NF_FLOWTABLE_COUNTER. Otherwise, the updates added by
commit ef803b3cf96a ("netfilter: flowtable: add counter support in HW
offload") are not effective when using act_ct.
While at it, now that we have the flag set, protect the call to
nf_ct_acct_update() by commit beb97d3a3192 ("net/sch