Re: [PATCH net-next] mcast: ensure L-L IPv6 packets are accepted by bridge

On 8/14/19 7:40 PM, Patrick Ruddy wrote: > Thanks both for the quick replies, answers inline... > > On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 02:55 +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: >> On 8/13/19 10:53 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote: >>> + Bridge maintainers, Linus >>> >> >> Good catch Ido, thanks! >> First I'd say the subje

Re: [PATCH net-next] mcast: ensure L-L IPv6 packets are accepted by bridge

Thanks both for the quick replies, answers inline... On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 02:55 +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > On 8/13/19 10:53 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > + Bridge maintainers, Linus > > > > Good catch Ido, thanks! > First I'd say the subject needs to reflect that this is a bridge change

Re: [PATCH net-next] mcast: ensure L-L IPv6 packets are accepted by bridge

On 8/13/19 10:53 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > + Bridge maintainers, Linus > Good catch Ido, thanks! First I'd say the subject needs to reflect that this is a bridge change better, please rearrange it like so - bridge: mcast: ... More below, > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:18:04PM +0100, Patrick Ruddy

Re: [PATCH net-next] mcast: ensure L-L IPv6 packets are accepted by bridge

+ Bridge maintainers, Linus On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:18:04PM +0100, Patrick Ruddy wrote: > At present only all-nodes IPv6 multicast packets are accepted by > a bridge interface that is not in multicast router mode. Since > other protocols can be running in the absense of multicast > forwarding e

[PATCH net-next] mcast: ensure L-L IPv6 packets are accepted by bridge

At present only all-nodes IPv6 multicast packets are accepted by a bridge interface that is not in multicast router mode. Since other protocols can be running in the absense of multicast forwarding e.g. OSPFv3 IPv6 ND. Change the test to allow all of the FFx2::/16 range to be accepted when not in m