From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:03:48 +0300
> We recently added a check to see if nla_nest_start() fails. There are
> two issues with that. First, if it fails then I don't think we should
> call nla_nest_cancel(). Second, it's slightly convoluted but the
> current code returns su
On 4/28/17 7:03 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We recently added a check to see if nla_nest_start() fails. There are
> two issues with that. First, if it fails then I don't think we should
> call nla_nest_cancel(). Second, it's slightly convoluted but the
> current code returns success but we should
We recently added a check to see if nla_nest_start() fails. There are
two issues with that. First, if it fails then I don't think we should
call nla_nest_cancel(). Second, it's slightly convoluted but the
current code returns success but we should return -EMSGSIZE instead.
Fixes: a50fe0ffd76f (