From: John Allen
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:00:23 -0500
> On 04/12/2016 03:12 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 14:38 -0500, John Allen wrote:
>>> Moves tx completion processing out of interrupt context, deferring work
>>> using a wait queue. With this work now deferred, we must acc
On 04/12/2016 03:12 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 14:38 -0500, John Allen wrote:
>> Moves tx completion processing out of interrupt context, deferring work
>> using a wait queue. With this work now deferred, we must account for the
>> possibility that skbs can be sent faster than
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 14:38 -0500, John Allen wrote:
> Moves tx completion processing out of interrupt context, deferring work
> using a wait queue. With this work now deferred, we must account for the
> possibility that skbs can be sent faster than we can process completion
> requests in which cas
Moves tx completion processing out of interrupt context, deferring work
using a wait queue. With this work now deferred, we must account for the
possibility that skbs can be sent faster than we can process completion
requests in which case the tx buffer will overflow. If the tx buffer is
full, ibmv
