On 19.01.2021 23:02, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:45:25 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> The comment is quite weird, there is no such thing as a vendor-specific
>> VPD id. 0x82 is the value of PCI_VPD_LRDT_ID_STRING. So what we are
>> doing here is simply checking whether the byte
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:45:25 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> The comment is quite weird, there is no such thing as a vendor-specific
> VPD id. 0x82 is the value of PCI_VPD_LRDT_ID_STRING. So what we are
> doing here is simply checking whether the byte at VPD address VPD_BASE
> is a valid string LRDT
The comment is quite weird, there is no such thing as a vendor-specific
VPD id. 0x82 is the value of PCI_VPD_LRDT_ID_STRING. So what we are
doing here is simply checking whether the byte at VPD address VPD_BASE
is a valid string LRDT, same as what is done a few lines later in
the code.
LRDT = Large
