On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:50:45AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 12/4/20 6:46 AM, Sieng Piaw Liew wrote:
> > Use netif_receive_skb_list to batch process rx skb.
> > Tested on BCM6328 320 MHz using iperf3 -M 512, increasing performance
> > by 12.5%.
> >
>
>
>
> Well, the real question is
On 12/3/2020 9:46 PM, Sieng Piaw Liew wrote:
> Use netif_receive_skb_list to batch process rx skb.
> Tested on BCM6328 320 MHz using iperf3 -M 512, increasing performance
> by 12.5%.
>
> Before:
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
> [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 120 MBytes
On 12/4/20 6:46 AM, Sieng Piaw Liew wrote:
> Use netif_receive_skb_list to batch process rx skb.
> Tested on BCM6328 320 MHz using iperf3 -M 512, increasing performance
> by 12.5%.
>
Well, the real question is why you do not simply use GRO,
to get 100% performance gain or more for TCP flows.
Use netif_receive_skb_list to batch process rx skb.
Tested on BCM6328 320 MHz using iperf3 -M 512, increasing performance
by 12.5%.
Before:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 120 MBytes 33.7 Mbits/sec 277 sender
[ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec
