Re: [PATCH net-next] Better handling of transition to NUD_PROBE state

2015-05-21 Thread Erik Kline
> Please, in the future, put a proper subsystem prefix in the Subject > line of your patch submissions. In this particular case "neigh: " > would have been appropriate and is what I added when applying your > patch. My apologies. > Applied, thanks. Appreciated. -ek -- To unsubscribe from this l

Re: [PATCH net-next] Better handling of transition to NUD_PROBE state

2015-05-21 Thread David Miller
From: Erik Kline Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:44:41 +0900 > [1] When entering NUD_PROBE state via neigh_update(), perhaps received > from userspace, correctly (re)initialize the probes count to zero. > > This is useful for forcing revalidation of a neighbor (for example > if the host is

Re: [PATCH net-next] Better handling of transition to NUD_PROBE state

2015-05-20 Thread Hannes Frederic Sowa
On Mi, 2015-05-20 at 12:42 +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Erik Kline wrote: > > [1] When entering NUD_PROBE state via neigh_update(), perhaps received > > from userspace, correctly (re)initialize the probes count to zero. > > > > This is useful for forcing