From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:32:55 -0700
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:30:12 +0300 (EEST)
> "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Commit 164891aadf1721fca4dce473bb0e0998181537c6 broke RTT
> > sampling of congestion control modules. Inaccurate timesta
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:30:12 +0300 (EEST)
"Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Commit 164891aadf1721fca4dce473bb0e0998181537c6 broke RTT
> sampling of congestion control modules. Inaccurate timestamps
> could be fed to them without providing any way for them to
> identify such cases. Previ
Commit 164891aadf1721fca4dce473bb0e0998181537c6 broke RTT
sampling of congestion control modules. Inaccurate timestamps
could be fed to them without providing any way for them to
identify such cases. Previously RTT sampler was called only if
FLAG_RETRANS_DATA_ACKED was not set filtering inaccurate
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:06:57 +0300 (EEST)
"Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking something like this to fix the cc module breakage
> introduced by the API change (haven't tested it besides compile):
>
>
> [RFC PATCH net-2.6] [TCP]: Con
I was thinking something like this to fix the cc module breakage
introduced by the API change (haven't tested it besides compile):
[RFC PATCH net-2.6] [TCP]: Congestion control API RTT sampling fix
Commit 164891aadf1721fca4dce473bb0e0998181537c6 broke RTT
sampling of congestion co