Re: [PATCH net] tunnels: Don't require remote endpoint or ID during creation.

2015-10-18 Thread David Miller
From: Jesse Gross Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:36:00 -0700 > Before lightweight tunnels existed, it really didn't make sense to > create a tunnel that was not fully specified, such as without a > destination IP address - the resulting packets would go nowhere. > However, with lightweight tunnels, th

Re: [PATCH net] tunnels: Don't require remote endpoint or ID during creation.

2015-10-17 Thread Thomas Graf
On 10/16/15 at 04:36pm, Jesse Gross wrote: > Before lightweight tunnels existed, it really didn't make sense to > create a tunnel that was not fully specified, such as without a > destination IP address - the resulting packets would go nowhere. > However, with lightweight tunnels, the opposite is t

[PATCH net] tunnels: Don't require remote endpoint or ID during creation.

2015-10-16 Thread Jesse Gross
Before lightweight tunnels existed, it really didn't make sense to create a tunnel that was not fully specified, such as without a destination IP address - the resulting packets would go nowhere. However, with lightweight tunnels, the opposite is true - it doesn't make sense to require this informa