On 02/11/17 - 11:26:21, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On 01/11/17 - 19:21:31, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 18:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 17:10 -0700, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> >>
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 01/11/17 - 19:21:31, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 18:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 17:10 -0700, Christoph Paasch wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yes, that looks good to me. Thanks!
>> > >
>> >
Hi Eric,
On 01/11/17 - 19:21:31, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 18:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 17:10 -0700, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, that looks good to me. Thanks!
> > >
> > > But we still need to clean up the skb in tcp_v4_send_reset and
>
On 01/11/17 - 18:00:10, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 17:10 -0700, Christoph Paasch wrote:
>
> > Yes, that looks good to me. Thanks!
> >
> > But we still need to clean up the skb in tcp_v4_send_reset and
> > tcp_v4_send_ack, as the fields (e.g., tcp_skb_cb->seq) have been set when
>
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 18:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 17:10 -0700, Christoph Paasch wrote:
>
> > Yes, that looks good to me. Thanks!
> >
> > But we still need to clean up the skb in tcp_v4_send_reset and
> > tcp_v4_send_ack, as the fields (e.g., tcp_skb_cb->seq) have been
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 17:10 -0700, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> Yes, that looks good to me. Thanks!
>
> But we still need to clean up the skb in tcp_v4_send_reset and
> tcp_v4_send_ack, as the fields (e.g., tcp_skb_cb->seq) have been set when
> coming from tcp_v4_rcv.
You might be confused : ip_sen
On 01/11/17 - 14:53:38, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 14:32 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> > > Since commit 971f10eca186 ("tcp: better TCP_SKB_CB layout to reduce cache
> > > line misses") IPCB/IP6CB is no more at the beginnin
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 14:32 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> > Since commit 971f10eca186 ("tcp: better TCP_SKB_CB layout to reduce cache
> > line misses") IPCB/IP6CB is no more at the beginning of the tcp_skb_cb.
> > This means that on the outp
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> Since commit 971f10eca186 ("tcp: better TCP_SKB_CB layout to reduce cache
> line misses") IPCB/IP6CB is no more at the beginning of the tcp_skb_cb.
> This means that on the output path, we need to make sure that it has
> been correctly init
Since commit 971f10eca186 ("tcp: better TCP_SKB_CB layout to reduce cache
line misses") IPCB/IP6CB is no more at the beginning of the tcp_skb_cb.
This means that on the output path, we need to make sure that it has
been correctly initialized to 0, as is done in tcp_transmit_skb.
However, when goin
10 matches
Mail list logo