From: Xin Long
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 14:15:13 +0800
> Commit 52253db924d1 ("sctp: also point GSO head_skb to the sk when
> it's available") used event->chunk->head_skb to get the head_skb in
> sctp_ulpevent_set_owner().
>
> But at that moment, the event->chunk was NULL, as it cloned the skb
> i
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:15:13PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> Commit 52253db924d1 ("sctp: also point GSO head_skb to the sk when
> it's available") used event->chunk->head_skb to get the head_skb in
> sctp_ulpevent_set_owner().
>
> But at that moment, the event->chunk was NULL, as it cloned the skb
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:15:13PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> Commit 52253db924d1 ("sctp: also point GSO head_skb to the sk when
> it's available") used event->chunk->head_skb to get the head_skb in
> sctp_ulpevent_set_owner().
>
> But at that moment, the event->chunk was NULL, as it cloned the skb
Commit 52253db924d1 ("sctp: also point GSO head_skb to the sk when
it's available") used event->chunk->head_skb to get the head_skb in
sctp_ulpevent_set_owner().
But at that moment, the event->chunk was NULL, as it cloned the skb
in sctp_ulpevent_make_rcvmsg(). Therefore, that patch didn't really