From: Xin Long
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 19:12:22 +0800
> Commit c86a773c7802 ("sctp: add dst_pending_confirm flag") introduced
> a temporary variable "confirm" in sctp_packet_transmit.
>
> But it broke the rule that longer lines should be above shorter ones.
> Besides, this variable is not necessa
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:12:22PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> Commit c86a773c7802 ("sctp: add dst_pending_confirm flag") introduced
> a temporary variable "confirm" in sctp_packet_transmit.
>
> But it broke the rule that longer lines should be above shorter ones.
> Besides, this variable is not nece
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2017, Xin Long wrote:
>
>> Commit c86a773c7802 ("sctp: add dst_pending_confirm flag") introduced
>> a temporary variable "confirm" in sctp_packet_transmit.
>>
>> But it broke the rule that longer lines s
Hello,
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017, Xin Long wrote:
> Commit c86a773c7802 ("sctp: add dst_pending_confirm flag") introduced
> a temporary variable "confirm" in sctp_packet_transmit.
>
> But it broke the rule that longer lines should be above shorter ones.
> Besides, this variable is not necessa
Commit c86a773c7802 ("sctp: add dst_pending_confirm flag") introduced
a temporary variable "confirm" in sctp_packet_transmit.
But it broke the rule that longer lines should be above shorter ones.
Besides, this variable is not necessary, so this patch is to just
remove it and use tp->dst_pending_co
