On 30/08/17 04:24, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
> wrote:
>> First I did it with the check in the for () conditional, but this is more
>> visible and explicit. Let me know if you'd like the shorter version. :-)
>
> Or, if you want to make the patch size
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
wrote:
> First I did it with the check in the for () conditional, but this is more
> visible and explicit. Let me know if you'd like the shorter version. :-)
Or, if you want to make the patch size smaller, just check NULL
before for():
if (!q
On 29/08/17 22:02, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> If sch_hhf fails in its ->init() function (either due to wrong
> user-space arguments as below or memory alloc failure of hh_flows) it
> will do a null pointer deref of q->hh_flows in its ->destroy() function.
>
> To reproduce the crash:
> $ tc qdisc
If sch_hhf fails in its ->init() function (either due to wrong
user-space arguments as below or memory alloc failure of hh_flows) it
will do a null pointer deref of q->hh_flows in its ->destroy() function.
To reproduce the crash:
$ tc qdisc add dev eth0 root hhf quantum 200 non_hh_weight 1
