On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:14 AM David Laight wrote:
>
> From: Willem de Bruijn
> > Sent: 26 April 2019 16:11
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:42 AM Willem de Bruijn
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:35 AM David Laight
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Willem de Bruijn
> > > > >
From: Willem de Bruijn
> Sent: 26 April 2019 16:11
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:42 AM Willem de Bruijn
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:35 AM David Laight
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Willem de Bruijn
> > > > Sent: 25 April 2019 14:57
> > > ...
> > > > > I've just done a bit of softwa
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:42 AM Willem de Bruijn
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:35 AM David Laight wrote:
> >
> > From: Willem de Bruijn
> > > Sent: 25 April 2019 14:57
> > ...
> > > > I've just done a bit of software archaeology.
> > > >
> > > > Prior to 2.6.14-rc3 the send code ignored
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:35 AM David Laight wrote:
>
> From: Willem de Bruijn
> > Sent: 25 April 2019 14:57
> ...
> > > I've just done a bit of software archaeology.
> > >
> > > Prior to 2.6.14-rc3 the send code ignored sll_halen, it was only set by
> > > the receive code.
> > > So it is not su
From: Willem de Bruijn
> Sent: 25 April 2019 14:57
...
> > I've just done a bit of software archaeology.
> >
> > Prior to 2.6.14-rc3 the send code ignored sll_halen, it was only set by the
> > receive code.
> > So it is not surprising that old application code leaves it as zero.
> >
> > The old re
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 5:32 AM David Laight wrote:
>
> From: Willem de Bruijn
> > Sent: 24 April 2019 20:35
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:14 PM Willem de Bruijn
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:21 PM Willem de Bruijn
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:21 PM W
From: Willem de Bruijn
> Sent: 24 April 2019 20:35
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:14 PM Willem de Bruijn
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:21 PM Willem de Bruijn
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:21 PM Willem de Bruijn
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:0
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:14 PM Willem de Bruijn
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:21 PM Willem de Bruijn
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:21 PM Willem de Bruijn
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:04 PM Willem de Bruijn
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 201
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:21 PM Willem de Bruijn
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:21 PM Willem de Bruijn
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:04 PM Willem de Bruijn
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:52 AM David Laight
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Willem de Bruij
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:21 PM Willem de Bruijn
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:04 PM Willem de Bruijn
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:52 AM David Laight
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Willem de Bruijn
> > > > Sent: 23 April 2019 16:08
> > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:59 AM Dav
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:04 PM Willem de Bruijn
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:52 AM David Laight wrote:
> >
> > From: Willem de Bruijn
> > > Sent: 23 April 2019 16:08
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:59 AM David Laight
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Willem de Bruijn
> > > > > Sent:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:52 AM David Laight wrote:
>
> From: Willem de Bruijn
> > Sent: 23 April 2019 16:08
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:59 AM David Laight
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Willem de Bruijn
> > > > Sent: 22 December 2018 21:54
> > > > Validate packet socket address length if a len
From: Willem de Bruijn
> Sent: 23 April 2019 16:08
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:59 AM David Laight wrote:
> >
> > From: Willem de Bruijn
> > > Sent: 22 December 2018 21:54
> > > Validate packet socket address length if a length is given. Zero
> > > length is equivalent to not setting an address.
>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:59 AM David Laight wrote:
>
> From: Willem de Bruijn
> > Sent: 22 December 2018 21:54
> > Validate packet socket address length if a length is given. Zero
> > length is equivalent to not setting an address.
> >
> > Fixes: 99137b7888f4 ("packet: validate address length")
>
From: Willem de Bruijn
> Sent: 22 December 2018 21:54
> Validate packet socket address length if a length is given. Zero
> length is equivalent to not setting an address.
>
> Fixes: 99137b7888f4 ("packet: validate address length")
> Reported-by: Ido Schimmel
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn
> -
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 6:13 PM David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Willem de Bruijn
> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 16:53:45 -0500
>
> > From: Willem de Bruijn
> >
> > Validate packet socket address length if a length is given. Zero
> > length is equivalent to not setting an address.
> >
> > Fixes: 99137b78
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 04:53:45PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn
>
> Validate packet socket address length if a length is given. Zero
> length is equivalent to not setting an address.
>
> Fixes: 99137b7888f4 ("packet: validate address length")
> Reported-by: Ido Schimme
From: Willem de Bruijn
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 16:53:45 -0500
> From: Willem de Bruijn
>
> Validate packet socket address length if a length is given. Zero
> length is equivalent to not setting an address.
>
> Fixes: 99137b7888f4 ("packet: validate address length")
> Reported-by: Ido Schimmel
From: Willem de Bruijn
Validate packet socket address length if a length is given. Zero
length is equivalent to not setting an address.
Fixes: 99137b7888f4 ("packet: validate address length")
Reported-by: Ido Schimmel
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 4 ++--
1 file
19 matches
Mail list logo
