On 10 May 2016 at 16:55, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> This would result in inconsistent helper assignment if a first CT action
> assigns a helper and a further CT action tries to assign a different helper;
> Typically the second helper assignment would be ignored, but if the
> unconfirmed conntrack
This would result in inconsistent helper assignment if a first CT action
assigns a helper and a further CT action tries to assign a different helper;
Typically the second helper assignment would be ignored, but if the unconfirmed
conntrack entry is lost due to an upcall the second helper assignm
When using conntrack helpers from OVS, a common configuration is to
perform a lookup without specifying a helper, then go through a
firewalling policy, only to decide to attach a helper afterwards.
In this case, the initial lookup will cause a ct entry to be attached to
the skb, then the later com
