From: Stephen Hemminger
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:33:38 -0700
> My change (introduced in 4.11) to use find_first_clear_bit
> incorrectly assumed that the size argument was words, not bits.
> The effect was only a small limited number of the available send
> sections were being actually used. This
On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 18:33 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> My change (introduced in 4.11) to use find_first_clear_bit
> incorrectly assumed that the size argument was words, not bits.
Oops...
> The effect was only a small limited number of the available send
> sections were being actually used
My change (introduced in 4.11) to use find_first_clear_bit
incorrectly assumed that the size argument was words, not bits.
The effect was only a small limited number of the available send
sections were being actually used. This can cause performance loss
with some workloads.
Since map_words is now