On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:24:00PM +1200, Xin Long wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:39:44PM +1200, Xin Long wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Con
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:39:44PM +1200, Xin Long wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:39:44PM +1200, Xin Long wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang
> > >> wrote
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:39:44PM +1200, Xin Long wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> >>> This looks like a completely API burden?
> >> netfilter xt targets are not
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Xin Long wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> This looks like a completely
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
This looks like a completely API burden?
>>> netfilter xt targets are not really compa
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> This looks like a completely API burden?
>> netfilter xt targets are not really compatible with netsched action.
>> I've got to say, the patc
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> This looks like a completely API burden?
> netfilter xt targets are not really compatible with netsched action.
> I've got to say, the patch is just a way to make checkentry return
> false and av
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> (Cc'ing netfilter and Jamal)
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Xin Long wrote:
>> As we know in some target's checkentry it may dereference par.entryinfo
>> to check entry stuff inside. But when sched action calls xt_check_target,
>> par.entryi
(Cc'ing netfilter and Jamal)
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> As we know in some target's checkentry it may dereference par.entryinfo
> to check entry stuff inside. But when sched action calls xt_check_target,
> par.entryinfo is set with NULL. It would cause kernel panic when cal
As we know in some target's checkentry it may dereference par.entryinfo
to check entry stuff inside. But when sched action calls xt_check_target,
par.entryinfo is set with NULL. It would cause kernel panic when calling
some targets.
It can be reproduce with:
# tc qd add dev eth1 ingress handle f
11 matches
Mail list logo
