From: Vladimir Oltean
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:54:09 +0300
> From: Vladimir Oltean
>
> It isn't actually described clearly at all in UM10944.pdf, but on TX of
> a management frame (such as PTP), this needs to happen:
>
> - The destination MAC address (i.e. 01-80-c2-00-00-0e), along with the
>
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:54:09PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> So fix this case of premature optimization by simply reordering the
> sja1105_ptpegr_ts_poll and the sja1105_ptpclkval_read function calls. It
> turns out that in practice, the 135 ms hard deadline for PTP timestamp
> wraparound is
From: Vladimir Oltean
It isn't actually described clearly at all in UM10944.pdf, but on TX of
a management frame (such as PTP), this needs to happen:
- The destination MAC address (i.e. 01-80-c2-00-00-0e), along with the
desired destination port, need to be installed in one of the 4
manageme
