From: Robert Hancock
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:33:32 -0600
> If some of the switch ports were not listed in the device tree, due to
> being unused, the ksz_mib_read_work function ended up accessing a NULL
> dp->slave pointer and causing an oops. Skip checking statistics for any
> unused ports.
>
On 6/12/19 1:33 PM, Robert Hancock wrote:
> If some of the switch ports were not listed in the device tree, due to
> being unused, the ksz_mib_read_work function ended up accessing a NULL
> dp->slave pointer and causing an oops. Skip checking statistics for any
> unused ports.
>
> Fixes: 7c6ff470a
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 02:33:32PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> If some of the switch ports were not listed in the device tree, due to
> being unused, the ksz_mib_read_work function ended up accessing a NULL
> dp->slave pointer and causing an oops. Skip checking statistics for any
> unused ports.
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:33:32 -0600, Robert Hancock
wrote:
> If some of the switch ports were not listed in the device tree, due to
> being unused, the ksz_mib_read_work function ended up accessing a NULL
> dp->slave pointer and causing an oops. Skip checking statistics for any
> unused ports.
>
If some of the switch ports were not listed in the device tree, due to
being unused, the ksz_mib_read_work function ended up accessing a NULL
dp->slave pointer and causing an oops. Skip checking statistics for any
unused ports.
Fixes: 7c6ff470aa867f53 ("net: dsa: microchip: add MIB counter reading
