On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 7:33 AM wenxu wrote:
> Thanks， I also think It is ok do fragment in the mirred output.
Please stop doing it. There is no way to make this acceptable.
You must be smart enough to find solutions elsewhere, possibly
not even in TC at all. It would be best if you can solve thi
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 5:47 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
>
> in this case a act_output_it_well could do it. ;-)
Yeah, still much better than making "mirred" do "mirror, redirect, frag,
defrag", can't we all agree it is too late to rename mirred? :)
Please do not try to add any arbitrary fun
在 2020/7/4 1:50, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 写道:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 06:19:51PM +0800, wenxu wrote:
>> On 7/3/2020 8:47 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 02:39:07PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:32 AM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 06:19:51PM +0800, wenxu wrote:
>
> On 7/3/2020 8:47 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 02:39:07PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:32 AM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:36:38PM +0800, we
On 7/3/2020 8:47 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 02:39:07PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:32 AM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:36:38PM +0800, wenxu wrote:
On 7/2/2020 1:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 02:39:07PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:32 AM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:36:38PM +0800, wenxu wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7/2/2020 1:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:21 AM wenxu wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:32 AM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:36:38PM +0800, wenxu wrote:
> >
> > On 7/2/2020 1:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:21 AM wenxu wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 7/1/2020 2:21 PM, wenxu wrote:
> > >>> On 7/1/2020 2:12 PM, Co
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:36:38PM +0800, wenxu wrote:
>
> On 7/2/2020 1:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:21 AM wenxu wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/1/2020 2:21 PM, wenxu wrote:
> >>> On 7/1/2020 2:12 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:03 PM wenxu wrote:
> > On
On 7/2/2020 1:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:21 AM wenxu wrote:
>>
>> On 7/1/2020 2:21 PM, wenxu wrote:
>>> On 7/1/2020 2:12 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:03 PM wenxu wrote:
> Only forward packet case need do fragment again and there is no need do
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:21 AM wenxu wrote:
>
>
> On 7/1/2020 2:21 PM, wenxu wrote:
> > On 7/1/2020 2:12 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:03 PM wenxu wrote:
> >>> Only forward packet case need do fragment again and there is no need do
> >>> defrag explicit.
> >> Same question
On 7/1/2020 2:21 PM, wenxu wrote:
> On 7/1/2020 2:12 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:03 PM wenxu wrote:
>>> Only forward packet case need do fragment again and there is no need do
>>> defrag explicit.
>> Same question: why act_mirred? You have to explain why act_mirred
>> has
On 7/1/2020 2:12 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:03 PM wenxu wrote:
>> Only forward packet case need do fragment again and there is no need do
>> defrag explicit.
> Same question: why act_mirred? You have to explain why act_mirred
> has the responsibility to do this job.
The
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:03 PM wenxu wrote:
>
> Only forward packet case need do fragment again and there is no need do
> defrag explicit.
Same question: why act_mirred? You have to explain why act_mirred
has the responsibility to do this job.
Thanks.
On 7/1/2020 1:52 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 7:36 PM wenxu wrote:
>>
>> On 7/1/2020 3:02 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:55 PM wrote:
From: wenxu
The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet
over the mtu in th
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 7:36 PM wenxu wrote:
>
>
> On 7/1/2020 3:02 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:55 PM wrote:
> >> From: wenxu
> >>
> >> The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet
> >> over the mtu in the act_mirred. This big packet should be fr
On 7/1/2020 3:02 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:55 PM wrote:
>> From: wenxu
>>
>> The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet
>> over the mtu in the act_mirred. This big packet should be fragmented
>> to send out.
> This is too brief. Why act_mirred
On 6/30/2020 11:57 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On 6/29/20 7:54 PM, we...@ucloud.cn wrote:
>> From: wenxu
>>
>> The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet
>> over the mtu in the act_mirred. This big packet should be fragmented
>> to send out.
>>
>> Fixes: b57dc7c13ea9
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:55 PM wrote:
>
> From: wenxu
>
> The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet
> over the mtu in the act_mirred. This big packet should be fragmented
> to send out.
This is too brief. Why act_mirred should handle the burden introduced by
act_ct
On 6/29/20 7:54 PM, we...@ucloud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu
>
> The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet
> over the mtu in the act_mirred. This big packet should be fragmented
> to send out.
>
> Fixes: b57dc7c13ea9 ("net/sched: Introduce action ct")
> Signed-off-by
From: wenxu
The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet
over the mtu in the act_mirred. This big packet should be fragmented
to send out.
Fixes: b57dc7c13ea9 ("net/sched: Introduce action ct")
Signed-off-by: wenxu
---
This patch is based on
http://patchwork.ozlabs.or
20 matches
Mail list logo
