Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Do not include rwlock.h directly

2020-07-07 Thread David Miller
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 18:44:32 +0200 > rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h > should be included. Including it directly will break the RT build. > > Fixes: 549c243e4e010 ("net/mlx5e: Extract neigh-specific code from en_rep.c > to re

Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Do not include rwlock.h directly

2020-07-06 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 18:44 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h > should be included. Including it directly will break the RT build. > > Fixes: 549c243e4e010 ("net/mlx5e: Extract neigh-specific code from > en_rep.c to rep/ne

Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Do not include rwlock.h directly

2020-07-05 Thread Leon Romanovsky
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 06:44:32PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h > should be included. Including it directly will break the RT build. > > Fixes: 549c243e4e010 ("net/mlx5e: Extract neigh-specific code from en_rep.c > to

[PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Do not include rwlock.h directly

2020-07-03 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h should be included. Including it directly will break the RT build. Fixes: 549c243e4e010 ("net/mlx5e: Extract neigh-specific code from en_rep.c to rep/neigh.c") Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior --- It would be nice if thi