From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:29:31 +0300
> I'm reviewing static checker warnings where we do ERR_PTR(0), which is
> the same as NULL. I'm pretty sure we intended to return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
> here. Sometimes these bugs lead to a NULL dereference but I don't
> immediately see tha
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 01:29:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I'm reviewing static checker warnings where we do ERR_PTR(0), which is
> the same as NULL. I'm pretty sure we intended to return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
> here. Sometimes these bugs lead to a NULL dereference but I don't
> immediately see
I'm reviewing static checker warnings where we do ERR_PTR(0), which is
the same as NULL. I'm pretty sure we intended to return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
here. Sometimes these bugs lead to a NULL dereference but I don't
immediately see that problem here.
Fixes: 71d0ed7079df ("net/act_pedit: Support using