On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:18:28PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for your patch.
>
> It looks good to me, in general.
> I just have one small comment below.
Thanks for your feedback and sorry for the delay.
>
> On 28/01/2017 9:40 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> > If the rx-queue
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 01:11:40PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tariq Toukan
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:18:28 +0200
>
> > It looks good to me, in general.
> > I just have one small comment below.
>
> Martin, please address Tariq's feedback.
Sorry for the delay. I am on PTO for this week an
From: Tariq Toukan
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:18:28 +0200
> It looks good to me, in general.
> I just have one small comment below.
Martin, please address Tariq's feedback.
Thank you.
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your patch.
It looks good to me, in general.
I just have one small comment below.
On 28/01/2017 9:40 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
If the rx-queues ever get re-initialized (e.g. by changing the
number of rx-queues with ethtool -L), the existing xdp_prog becomes
inactive.
T
From: Martin KaFai Lau
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 23:40:51 -0800
> If the rx-queues ever get re-initialized (e.g. by changing the
> number of rx-queues with ethtool -L), the existing xdp_prog becomes
> inactive.
>
> The bug is that the xdp_prog ptr has not been carried over from
> the old rx-queues
If the rx-queues ever get re-initialized (e.g. by changing the
number of rx-queues with ethtool -L), the existing xdp_prog becomes
inactive.
The bug is that the xdp_prog ptr has not been carried over from
the old rx-queues to the new rx-queues
Fixes: 47a38e155037 ("net/mlx4_en: add support for fa
