On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 08:56:32PM -0700, Wei Wang wrote:
> From: Wei Wang
>
> In the code path where only rcu read lock is held, e.g. in the route
> lookup code path, it is not safe to directly call fib6_info_hold()
> because the fib6_info may already have been deleted but still exists
> in the
From: Wei Wang
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 20:56:32 -0700
> From: Wei Wang
>
> In the code path where only rcu read lock is held, e.g. in the route
> lookup code path, it is not safe to directly call fib6_info_hold()
> because the fib6_info may already have been deleted but still exists
> in the rcu
On 7/21/18 9:56 PM, Wei Wang wrote:
> From: Wei Wang
>
> In the code path where only rcu read lock is held, e.g. in the route
> lookup code path, it is not safe to directly call fib6_info_hold()
> because the fib6_info may already have been deleted but still exists
> in the rcu grace period. Hold
From: Wei Wang
In the code path where only rcu read lock is held, e.g. in the route
lookup code path, it is not safe to directly call fib6_info_hold()
because the fib6_info may already have been deleted but still exists
in the rcu grace period. Holding reference to it could cause double
free and
