On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 12:24 -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> This should be fixed now, thanks for letting me know.
Perfect, thanks !
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:22:06 -0800
> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:59:42 -0800
>>
>> > From: Eric Dumazet
>> >
>> > We should not assume a valid protocol header is present,
>> > as this is not th
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:59:42 -0800
>
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > We should not assume a valid protocol header is present,
> > as this is not the case for IPv4 fragments.
> >
> > Lets avoid extra cache line miss
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:59:42 -0800
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> We should not assume a valid protocol header is present,
> as this is not the case for IPv4 fragments.
>
> Lets avoid extra cache line misses and potential bugs
> if we actually find a socket and incorrectly uses
From: Eric Dumazet
We should not assume a valid protocol header is present,
as this is not the case for IPv4 fragments.
Lets avoid extra cache line misses and potential bugs
if we actually find a socket and incorrectly uses its dst.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
---
net/ipv4/ip_input.c |5 +
