From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 15:37:20 -0700
> - bpf prog_array just like all other types of bpf array accepts 32-bit index.
> Clarify that in the comment.
> - fix x64 JIT of bpf_tail_call which was incorrectly loading 8 instead of 4
> bytes
> - tighten corresponding check in
On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 15:37 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> - bpf prog_array just like all other types of bpf array accepts 32-bit index.
> Clarify that in the comment.
> - fix x64 JIT of bpf_tail_call which was incorrectly loading 8 instead of 4
> bytes
> - tighten corresponding check in the
- bpf prog_array just like all other types of bpf array accepts 32-bit index.
Clarify that in the comment.
- fix x64 JIT of bpf_tail_call which was incorrectly loading 8 instead of 4
bytes
- tighten corresponding check in the interpreter to stay consistent
The JIT bug can be triggered after int
