From: Andy Gospodarek
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:14:08 -0500
> When busy polling while a link is down (during a link-flap test), TX
> timeouts were observed as well as the following messages in the ring
> buffer:
>
> bnxt_en 0008:01:00.2 enP8p1s0f2d2: Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x51
> bnxt_en 0008:0
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 10:55 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > Any plans removing this busy polling stuff, now it is done in core
> > networking stack ?
> >
> > This would remove bnxt_lock_napi() extra overhead in normal path ( napi
> > poll
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 13:14 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>> When busy polling while a link is down (during a link-flap test), TX
>> timeouts were observed as well as the following messages in the ring
>> buffer:
>>
>> bnxt_en 0008:01:00.2 en
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 13:14 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> When busy polling while a link is down (during a link-flap test), TX
> timeouts were observed as well as the following messages in the ring
> buffer:
>
> bnxt_en 0008:01:00.2 enP8p1s0f2d2: Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x51
> bnxt_en 0008:01:00
When busy polling while a link is down (during a link-flap test), TX
timeouts were observed as well as the following messages in the ring
buffer:
bnxt_en 0008:01:00.2 enP8p1s0f2d2: Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x51
bnxt_en 0008:01:00.2 enP8p1s0f2d2: hwrm_ring_free tx failed. rc:-1
bnxt_en 0008:01:00.2
