Hi David,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:40 AM David Miller wrote:
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:29:31 +0200
>
> > This reverts commit 1838d6c62f57836639bd3d83e7855e0ee4f6defc.
> >
> > This commit moved the ravb_mdio_init() call (and thus the
> > of_mdiobus_register() call) f
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:29:31 +0200
> This reverts commit 1838d6c62f57836639bd3d83e7855e0ee4f6defc.
>
> This commit moved the ravb_mdio_init() call (and thus the
> of_mdiobus_register() call) from the ravb_probe() to the ravb_open()
> call. This causes a regression du
On 22.09.2020 10:29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
This reverts commit 1838d6c62f57836639bd3d83e7855e0ee4f6defc.
This commit moved the ravb_mdio_init() call (and thus the
of_mdiobus_register() call) from the ravb_probe() to the ravb_open()
call. This causes a regression during system resume (s2idl
This reverts commit 1838d6c62f57836639bd3d83e7855e0ee4f6defc.
This commit moved the ravb_mdio_init() call (and thus the
of_mdiobus_register() call) from the ravb_probe() to the ravb_open()
call. This causes a regression during system resume (s2idle/s2ram), as
new PHY devices cannot be bound while