On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 9:26 AM, John Fastabend
wrote:
> On 06/13/2018 02:04 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> Using skb_reserve(skb, I40E_SKB_PAD + (xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start))
>> is clearly wrong since I40E_SKB_PAD already points to the offset where
>> the original xdp->data was sitting since
On 06/13/2018 02:04 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Using skb_reserve(skb, I40E_SKB_PAD + (xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start))
> is clearly wrong since I40E_SKB_PAD already points to the offset where
> the original xdp->data was sitting since xdp->data_hard_start is defined
> as xdp->data - i40e_rx_off
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:04:36AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Using skb_reserve(skb, I40E_SKB_PAD + (xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start))
> is clearly wrong since I40E_SKB_PAD already points to the offset where
> the original xdp->data was sitting since xdp->data_hard_start is defined
> as xdp->
Using skb_reserve(skb, I40E_SKB_PAD + (xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start))
is clearly wrong since I40E_SKB_PAD already points to the offset where
the original xdp->data was sitting since xdp->data_hard_start is defined
as xdp->data - i40e_rx_offset(rx_ring) where latter offsets to I40E_SKB_PAD
when
