On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 08:23:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Rafael, in case you're interested in the driver core issue here]
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 07:08:07AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 03:41:41PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021
[+cc Rafael, in case you're interested in the driver core issue here]
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 07:08:07AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 03:41:41PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:47:16PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:03:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > It isn't a struct device object at all though, it just organizing
> > attributes.
>
> That's the point, it really is not. You are forced to create a real
> object for that subdirectory, and by doing so, you are "breaking" the
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 09:19:29AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 08:38:39AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 07:43:41PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > With :01:00.0/sriov/BB:DD.F/vf_msix_count, sriov/ will contain
> > > > 1 file and 1
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 08:38:39AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 07:43:41PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > With :01:00.0/sriov/BB:DD.F/vf_msix_count, sriov/ will contain
> > > 1 file and 1K subdirectories.
> >
> > The smallest directory sizes is with the curre
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 07:43:41PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > With :01:00.0/sriov/BB:DD.F/vf_msix_count, sriov/ will contain
> > 1 file and 1K subdirectories.
>
> The smallest directory sizes is with the current patch since it
> re-uses the existing VF directory. Do we care about direct
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 03:41:41PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:47:16PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:00:19AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:57:38AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 03:41:41PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:47:16PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:00:19AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:57:38AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:47:16PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:00:19AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:57:38AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 08:29:49PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think I misund
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:00:19AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:57:38AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 08:29:49PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> > > I think I misunderstood Greg's subdirectory comment. We already have
> > > directories lik
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 08:29:49PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 04:01:48PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:50:44AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >
> > > My concern would be that we are defining the user space interface.
> > > Once we have thi
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:57:38AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 08:29:49PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > I think I misunderstood Greg's subdirectory comment. We already have
> > directories like this:
>
> Yes, IIRC, Greg's remark applies if you have to start creati
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 08:29:49PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I think I misunderstood Greg's subdirectory comment. We already have
> directories like this:
Yes, IIRC, Greg's remark applies if you have to start creating
directories with manual kobjects.
> and aspm_ctrl_attr_group (for "link")
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 04:01:48PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:50:44AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
> > My concern would be that we are defining the user space interface.
> > Once we have this working as a single operation I could see us having
> > to support it t
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:36:31PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:50:44AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
> > I almost wonder if it wouldn't make sense to just partition this up to
> > handle flexible resources in the future. Maybe something like having
> > the directory
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:12:09PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:08:31PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > Leon has implemented a ton of variations, but I don't think having all
> > the files in the PF directory was one of them.
>
> If you promise this is the last of
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:50:44AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> I almost wonder if it wouldn't make sense to just partition this up to
> handle flexible resources in the future. Maybe something like having
> the directory setup such that you have "sriov_resources/msix/" and
> then you could hav
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:50:44AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> My concern would be that we are defining the user space interface.
> Once we have this working as a single operation I could see us having
> to support it that way going forward as somebody will script something
> not expecting an
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:08 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:00:50AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:44 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:28:36PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:20:21PM
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 02:29:00AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:08:31PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > I also want to resurrect your idea of associating
> > "sriov_vf_msix_count" with the PF instead of the VF. I really like
> > that idea, and it better reflects the way b
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:08:31PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I also want to resurrect your idea of associating
> "sriov_vf_msix_count" with the PF instead of the VF. I really like
> that idea, and it better reflects the way both mlx5 and NVMe work.
That is a better match for nvme: we can assi
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:08:31PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Leon has implemented a ton of variations, but I don't think having all
> the files in the PF directory was one of them.
If you promise this is the last of this bike painting adventure then
let's do it.
Jason
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:00:50AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:44 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:28:36PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:36
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:00:50AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:44 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:28:36PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 0
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:44 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:28:36PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:36:46PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:28:36PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:36:46PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:21:44PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > >
> > > > NVMe and mlx5 ha
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 03:31:57AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote:
> The NVMe IO queue resources are assignable just like the MSIx vectors.
> But they're not always assigned 1:1. For example:
But this is all driver configuration, the driver might be running in
some VM.
It seems saner to have two kerne
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:36:46PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:21:44PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > NVMe and mlx5 have basically identical functionality in this respect.
> > Other devices and vendors will likely implement similar functionality.
> > It would be i
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:36:46PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:21:44PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> > > NVMe and mlx5 have basically identical functionality in this respect.
> > > Other devices a
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:36:46PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:21:44PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > NVMe and mlx5 have basically identical functionality in this respect.
> > Other devices and vendors will likely implement similar functionality.
> > It would be i
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:21:44PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> NVMe and mlx5 have basically identical functionality in this respect.
> Other devices and vendors will likely implement similar functionality.
> It would be ideal if we had an interface generic enough to support
> them all.
>
> Is t
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 05:44:24PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 05:50:34AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 04:22:34PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:16:02PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:59:38AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:32 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 06:53:16PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 3:21 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:03:19PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:59:38AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
> > Lastly by splitting out the onlining step you can avoid potentially
> > releasing a broken VF to be reserved if there is some sort of
> > unrecoverable error bet
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:59:38AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> Lastly by splitting out the onlining step you can avoid potentially
> releasing a broken VF to be reserved if there is some sort of
> unrecoverable error between steps 2 and 3.
If the PF FW gets in a state that it can't respond to
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:32 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 06:53:16PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 3:21 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 01:49:24PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > > > We don't need to invent ne
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 09:00:17AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 06:53:16PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 3:21 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 01:49:24PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > > > We don't need to inv
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 06:53:16PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 3:21 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 01:49:24PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > > We don't need to invent new locks and new complexity for something
> > > > that is trivially so
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 06:53:16PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 3:21 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 01:49:24PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > > We don't need to invent new locks and new complexity for something
> > > > that is trivially so
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 3:21 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 01:49:24PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > We don't need to invent new locks and new complexity for something
> > > that is trivially solved already.
> >
> > I am not wanting a new lock. What I am wanting is a w
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 01:49:24PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > We don't need to invent new locks and new complexity for something
> > that is trivially solved already.
>
> I am not wanting a new lock. What I am wanting is a way to mark the VF
> as being stale/offline while we are performing
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:19 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:37:28AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>
> > Then the flow for this could be changed where we take the VF lock and
> > mark it as "stale" to prevent any driver binding and then we can
> > release the VF lock. N
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 05:50:34AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 04:22:34PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:16:02PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:17:29PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:34
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 04:22:34PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:16:02PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:17:29PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:34:01PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm not so much
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:17:29PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > In addition it still feels rather hacky to be modifying read-only PCIe
> > configuration space on the fly via a backdoor provided by the PF. It
> > almost feels like this should be some sort of quirk rather than a
> > standard feat
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:16:02PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:17:29PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:34:01PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not so much worried about management software as the fact that
> > > this is a vendor s
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:37:28AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> Then the flow for this could be changed where we take the VF lock and
> mark it as "stale" to prevent any driver binding and then we can
> release the VF lock. Next we would perform the PF operation telling it
> to update the VF.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:51 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:37:28AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:17 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:34:01PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:09
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:37:28AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:17 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:34:01PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:09 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:17 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:34:01PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:09 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:16:02PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:17:29PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:34:01PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not so much worried about management software as the fact that
> > > this is a vendor sp
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:17:29PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:34:01PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:09 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 P
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:17:29PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:34:01PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >
> > I'm not so much worried about management software as the fact that
> > this is a vendor specific implementation detail that is shaping how
> > the kernel interf
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:34:01PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:09 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > > >
> > >
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 09:21:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:10:41PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:09:06PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 20
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:09 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > >
> > > @Alexander Duyck, please update me if I can add your ROB tag again
> > >
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:10:41PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:09:06PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > >
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:09:06PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > >
> > > @Alexander Duyck, please update me if I can add your ROB tag again
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky
> >
> > @Alexander Duyck, please update me if I can add your ROB tag again
> > to the series, because you liked v6 more.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:55:20AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky
<...>
> Leon Romanovsky (4):
> PCI: Add a sysfs file to change the MSI-X table size of SR-IOV VFs
> net/mlx5: Add dynamic MSI-X capabilities bits
> net/mlx5: Dynamically assign MSI-X vectors count
>
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:33:03AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:19 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky
>
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:19 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > >
> > > @Alexander Duyck, please update me if I can add your ROB tag again
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > From: Leon Romanovsky
> >
> > @Alexander Duyck, please update me if I can add your ROB tag again
> > to the series, because you liked v6 more.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> From: Leon Romanovsky
>
> @Alexander Duyck, please update me if I can add your ROB tag again
> to the series, because you liked v6 more.
>
> Thanks
>
> -
> C
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:55:20AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky
>
> @Alexander Duyck, please update me if I can add your ROB tag again
> to the series, because you liked v6 more.
>
> Thanks
>
> ---
From: Leon Romanovsky
@Alexander Duyck, please update me if I can add your ROB tag again
to the series, because you liked v6 more.
Thanks
-
Changelog
v7:
* Rebase on top v5.12-rc1
* More english fixes
* Returned
66 matches
Mail list logo
