On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller
wrote:
>
>> On April 15, 2017 at 8:20 PM Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller
>> wrote:
>> > Before I do that - trying to wrap my head around the interdependencies
>> > here better to be thorough - I noti
Wolfgang, can you _please_ stop cc-ing lkml? Everybody you need to deal
with is on netdev.
On 17-04-15 02:48 PM, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
So I'm not sure exactly how the module and tc_action counts are related
(and I usually like to understand my own patches ;-) ).
Every time we add
> On April 15, 2017 at 8:20 PM Cong Wang wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller
> wrote:
> > Before I do that - trying to wrap my head around the interdependencies
> > here better to be thorough - I noticed that tcf_hash_release() can
> > return ACT_P_DELETED. The ACT_
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller
wrote:
> Before I do that - trying to wrap my head around the interdependencies
> here better to be thorough - I noticed that tcf_hash_release() can
> return ACT_P_DELETED. The ACT_P_CREATED case means tcf_hash_create()
> was used, in the other ca
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:03:37AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:27:31PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >> Instead of duplicating code, you can add the check
> >> to the module_put() next to err_mod label? I mean:
>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:27:31PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> Instead of duplicating code, you can add the check
>> to the module_put() next to err_mod label? I mean:
>
> I just realized that with module_put() happening in both error and
Wolfgang Bumiller writes:
> If memory allocation for nla_memdup_cookie() fails
> module_put has to be guarded by the same condition as it was
> before the TCA_ACT_COOKIE has been added as stated in the
> comment afterwards:
>
What if a new entry has been created, and a_o->init returns
ACT_P_CREA
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:27:31PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller
> wrote:
> > If memory allocation for nla_memdup_cookie() fails
> > module_put has to be guarded by the same condition as it was
> > before the TCA_ACT_COOKIE has been added as stated in
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller
wrote:
> If memory allocation for nla_memdup_cookie() fails
> module_put has to be guarded by the same condition as it was
> before the TCA_ACT_COOKIE has been added as stated in the
> comment afterwards:
>
> /* module count goes up only when bran
If memory allocation for nla_memdup_cookie() fails
module_put has to be guarded by the same condition as it was
before the TCA_ACT_COOKIE has been added as stated in the
comment afterwards:
/* module count goes up only when brand new policy is created
* if it exists and is only bound to in a_o->i
10 matches
Mail list logo