On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 11/10/16 02:23, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy
>> wrote:
>>> There is at least one Chelsio 10Gb card which uses VPD area to store
>>> some custom blocks (example below). However pc
On 11/10/16 02:23, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> There is at least one Chelsio 10Gb card which uses VPD area to store
>> some custom blocks (example below). However pci_vpd_size() returns
>> the length of the first block only assuming tha
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> There is at least one Chelsio 10Gb card which uses VPD area to store
> some custom blocks (example below). However pci_vpd_size() returns
> the length of the first block only assuming that there can be only
> one VPD "End Tag" and VFI
Anyone, ping?
On 29/09/16 15:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> There is at least one Chelsio 10Gb card which uses VPD area to store
> some custom blocks (example below). However pci_vpd_size() returns
> the length of the first block only assuming that there can be only
> one VPD "End Tag" and VFIO
There is at least one Chelsio 10Gb card which uses VPD area to store
some custom blocks (example below). However pci_vpd_size() returns
the length of the first block only assuming that there can be only
one VPD "End Tag" and VFIO blocks access beyond that offset
(since 4e1a63555) which leads to the
